Home  :  Fossil Power Plants  :  The Technology  :  Newsletter  :  About Us  :  Contact Us :  German Version  
The Technology 
 

The AE phenomenon


Materials and structures that undergo stress, deformation and cracking processes, emit sound and ultrasound waves i.e. acoustic emission signals. These signals can be acquired by sensitive sensors that are mounted throughout the entire length of the line. The unique QAE NDI analysis of these signals is used for the identification of flaws’ location, their type, danger level and the dynamics of their development.

Monitoring System


Measurement points are typically spaced 15 ft (~5 meters) from each other and in potential high stress zones, closer. The average spacing is 10ft (~3 meters) for Hot-Reheat (HRH) and Main Steam (MS) lines and 8 ft (~2.5 meters) for Cold Reheat (CRH) lines. Each measurement point includes: sensor (A), preamplifier (B) and waveguide (C).



The waveguides are welded to the line by a stud welding gun. The sensor is installed at the waveguide tip. The preamplifier amplifies the signal, which is then transmitted to the data recording computer through coaxial cables. Installation of the entire system is done on running lines without scaffolds.

The Analysis



Margan developed a unique statistical approach to the AE signals analysis. This includes, among variety of statistical tools, the ellipse of dispersion, which is used for:

1) Creation of laboratory -made flaw-material and flaw-stage specific AE "finger prints".

2) Characterization and classification of different groups of AE Signals.

3) Characterization of the background noise.

Ellipses of dispersion are used in the analysis process for accurate separation and filtration of the background noise, friction noise and other non-related signals, already in the field. The remaining signals which are related to flaw-development (crack propagation, creep development, fracturing of hard inclusions, etc.) are analyzed to determine flaw-types and their danger level. This is done by comparing their ellipses (the solid ellipse in the example) to the lab-made AE "finger-prints" (the transparent ellipses).



The Report and Results



Results and recommendations include:
  1. Locating zones of active flaw development in the line (marked yellow).
  2. Flaw 'type'
  3. Determining their danger level in terms of fracture mechanics criteria (J-integral value).
  4. Recommendations for further monitoring intervals.

Hangers and Supports Performance


Proper performance of hangers and supports plays a crucial role in the line integrity. Improper performance of hangers and supports can create overstressed zones, increase the risk of flaw nucleation and accelerates development of existing flaws.

In this HRH line,the AE activity at the hangers had changed significantly between the inspections of 7/2000 (green bars) and 1/2001 (blue bars). The analysis showed indications of overstresses in the piping between hangers No 4 and No 5 due to malfunctioning of hanger No 4. This hanger was repaired and the line was inspected again 2 years later. The results of the inspection (pink bars) show more uniform distribution of stresses along the line. Consequently, the development of flaws that had been identified in the previous inspection, was slowed down.

 
Home  |  Fossil Power Plants  |  The Technology  |  Newsletter   |  About Us  |  Contact Us
©Margan, Inc. 2003